Some Thoughts About 2010 vs 2009

Yo, MR CRAW here discussing how NCAA 2010 is a defensive game and is very different than the more offensive based 2009 title. In 2009 it was all about the O, defence was far inferior to the offense; it was much easier to crank it in for 6 possession after possession. Wide receivers owned db's, and running backs like beanie wells or knowshawn were extremely difficult to defend. QB's could throw the ball 70 yards on a dime and were hardly ever phased by the pass rush. People would do onside kicks on me in the second quarter because they had no means to stopping my offence other than keeping it off the field. It seemed like people went for it every 4th down because they knew they'd probably get it, and even if they didn't, who cares because they know I am going to score anyways. Then you had the cheeser people who exploited glitches like the rocket catch, Qb walk, or the classic, "run out of bounds, run back in bounds and catch it over 5 helpless defenders."

In 2010 defense seems to be the name of the game. Your defense actually covers people and breaks up passes, your defenders gang tackle and bring the wood on the hit stick. The pass rush is legit and significantly effects the play of the Qb. Overall, the defenders seem much more aware of what is going on and if your not careful, you will turn the ball over very easily. The defensive aggressive/conservative gameplan is a great ally to keeping your opponent out of the endzone. The ability to change the depth of your zones is huge, you get user jump snap really easily, and the big hit perk is awesome. These features make moving the ball a frustrating task, especially if you are playing someone with exceptional defensive skill.

Let me know what you think about these '09 '10 differences, likes dislikes?